brave, new world
November 13, 2016
it’s quite “easy” to be an armchair quarterback and we can offer analyses until we’re blue in the face. Most people are obsessed with the wedding and not the marriage – sure I can be “calmer” as I don’t live in America but it also has repercussions for the rest of the world. The reality is that the US election went as it did – I’m now more focused on the First 100 Days of the presidency as a harbinger. The real question is what now?
America looking more inwards is an opportunity for the rest of the world. Sure it will be difficult but, in my opinion, it’s not really fair of us to expect them to be the world’s “policeman” (despite in the past assuming and cherishing that role). Maybe it’s time for us to say thank you and wean ourselves from our dependence. We should accept whatever help they offer but not expect it – it’s neither their duty nor responsibility. Instead of looking externally to save us, we should also look to ourselves to alleviate misery: sure a helping hand would be great and much appreciated but what would it do for our “pride” if we can participate in the “solution”.
Many of us confuse the “idea” of America for the country – in my dealings US citizens aren’t the government and it’s not right to think they’re interchangeable. They should be viewed as an “exemplar” and not a “savior” despite recent history. Why do we continue to pin our hopes on a single country and not more appropriately on a consortium of nations? Sure, we can’t discount leadership but should it only always come from one source? In my mind, we depend too much on someone else to solve all of our “problems.”
You’d think that after the Global Financial Crisis of 2008, the markets would factor in all eventualities but they crashed nonetheless. It’s this type of fingers-in-the-ears and hopeful thinking that contributes to the growing disdain for globalisation and interconnectedness.
As David Brooks rightly points out: there’s a rise of “ethnic nationalism” worldwide partly due to “elitist condescension”. We need to stop making others feel stupid to show off our intellect or schooling. It shouldn’t be about telling people what to think but enabling others to think for themselves. It’s not always about being “right” and sanctimonious about it. Case in point, it’s not that political correctness per se is wrong but it’s the shoving down other people’s throat while acting smugly that leaves such a bitter taste in the mouth for some. We can learn a lot about human psychology.
My supervisor once taught me the phrase: “Local maxima, global minima”. It’s unrealistic to rely on altruism when self-interest is hard-wired in our DNA. Sure there will be some where character and principles will override baser instincts but they are few and far in-between. Why are we even surprised when most people don’t act as we expect? Admittedly, I’m occasionally guilty of this optimism – I’m just more conscious of it now. Not to be one of those but I think we need to review how we educate our young: just basic literacy and numeracy are no longer sufficient.
Like Dr. King said: “The arc of history is long”; but one has to wonder: is this merely a hiccup in “experiment” of America or the beginning of the end of the project?